Professor Phil Jones, told MPs he had written 'some pretty awful emails'

but denied trying to suppress data, really? then why did The Institute of Physics say that 'worrying implications' had been raised after it was revealed the University of East Anglia had manipulated data on global warming,? in yet more of the lies about man made global warming, they revealed scientists plotting how to avoid responding to Freedom of Information requests from climate change sceptics, some even appeared to show the researchers discussing how to manipulate raw data from tree rings about historical temperatures, in one, Professor Jones talks about using a 'trick' to massage figures and 'hide the decline', giving evidence to a Science and Technology Committee inquiry, the Institute of Physics said: 'Unless the disclosed emails are proved to be forgeries or adaptations, worrying implications arise for the integrity of scientific research and for the credibility of the scientific method', last month, the Information Commissioner ruled the CRU had broken Freedom of Information rules by refusing to hand over raw data, to dangerous for you or I to read you see, but yesterday Professor Jones - in his first public appearance since the scandal broke - denied manipulating the figures, looking pale and clasping his shaking hands in front of him, he told MPs: 'I have obviously written some pretty awful emails,' he also admitted he claimed it was not 'standard practice' to release data and computer models so other scientists could check and challenge research, well we do not want anyone questioning your methods do we? and he still has not handed over the raw data - yet, all together now, 'man made global warming is a totally expensive to big to stop myth!'