At Last Sense From The EPA!

not that the EPA wanted the World Wide public to hear it! meet Alan Carlin: the EPA’s inconvenient voice, having worked for the EPA for over 35 years Alan felt he could no longer side with the tree huggers and at last agreed with me, my views over the state of the world are the same since before I left the UK some 10 years ago, they are a matter of public record and I have repeated them many times on our blog, the seas are falling, the earth is cooling, recycling in the US and Europe cost more than it saves etc, well having made a statement (a 98 page report) it prompted his supervisor to warn it could have had a “very negative impact on this office.”

Carlin’s director, Al McGartland, forbade him from having “any direct communication” with anyone outside his office about his study. “There should be no meetings, emails, written statements, phone calls, etc.” at 8:45 a.m. EDT on the June 30 edition of "Fox and Friends," EPA Senior Operations Research Analyst Alan Carlin, told interviewer Steve Doocy that his 98-page study that questioned the science behind global warming and called for the EPA to stop depending on reports from the United Nations, was ignored by his supervisor who refused to forward the report on because Carlin’s “comments do not help the legal policy or case” for the EPA’s position on global warming, oh no! a chance that the truth might slip out! the following exchange was aired on the June 30th edition of Fox and Friends:

STEVE DOOCY, co-host, "Fox and Friends": Good morning, most of us are not scientists, You are, You've worked for the EPA for 38 years, tell us in a nutshell what your report said this spring,

ALAN CARLIN, EPA analyst: the most important finding was that EPA in my view needed to look at the science behind global warming and not depend on reports issued by the United Nations which is what they were thinking of doing and have done,

DOOCY: and, in fact, it's problematic because for the last 11 years, temperatures had been dropping, so your report pretty much turned the whole global warming debate on its head, and what happened to your report? I understand it was hushed up,

well it was!

the EPA now justifies the suppression of the study because economist Carlin (a 35-year veteran of the agency who also holds a B.S. in physics) “is an individual who is not a scientist.” neither is Al Gore, nor is environmental czar Carol Browner, nor is cap-and-trade shepherd Nancy Pelosi, why can not the EPA just be friends and agree with Alan and myself? to easy I surpose!

that's life!